Book Review | A Matter of Rats

A Matter of Rats | Amitava Kumar

Rodents and memories

In Amitava Kumar’s biography of Patna, one of the several passages that stirred me is this one, where the author confesses why he would write on rats in the prologue: “Writers often marshal inordinate zeal when portraying the misery of the downtrodden and the oppressed: it is only a form of narcissism.… No doubt I am guilty of this too, but I plead equal fondness for folly, pleasure, guile, greed, and hypocrisy. Hence, the rats.”

Rats, in Kumar’s A Matter of Rats, are a universe unto their own, creating a parallel, subaltern underworld—“the first inhabitants of Patna” that symbolize the decay and chaos the city represents. In the Patna that Kumar knows, rats bring down a library, coexist in a museum with objects of Mauryan art and Buddhist relics, emerge from bathroom bowls, steal grandma’s dentures, puncture ultrasonic machines in hospitals and even drink liquor from the illegal bottles recovered by the local police, a story, Kumar says, he himself didn’t instantly buy.

At its centre are three narratives of Patna, told through three distinct sets of people. The first Patna is made up of people who were born and brought up in the city and later moved elsewhere, like Kumar himself; the second belongs to people who continue to live there, out of will or compulsion; and the third is a city of supposed solace, attracting people from the hinterlands and outside Bihar, who come because they think they can help or need help themselves.

Most of Kumar’s reference points are from literature, historical texts and eye-witness accounts of travellers to the city: the scenic Marabar Hills in E.M. Forster’s A Passage to India, the bandits from Bihar in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake, Hollywood actor Marlon Brando’s impressions of malnutrition among Patna’s children, among others.

“I’m not alone in offering such assessments,” Kumar writes, and goes on to describe the other Patna, as explored through its famous expatriates like artist Subodh Gupta and journalist Shiva Naipaul, brother of author V.S. Naipaul. While Gupta reconciles to his roots as an artist and plumbs his past to shape his art, Naipaul rejected Patna as “a town without the faintest traces of charm”. Then, there is Ian Jack, former editor of Granta, whose essay on Patna—Unsteady People—was compassionate towards “half-naked, nameless toiling figures” in the city, an essay Kumar quotes to underline the universality of failure and ineptness.

The book precisely illustrates this. Kumar may appear to be a cynic, ignoring stories on Patna that remain untold, but the book does bust a few exalted myths about the city. Kumar’s achievement is in making his story partly funny, and partly grim, almost always aiming at objectivity.

Originally published in Mint.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.